Other
Notifications that respect a decision
39 supporters980 influence
10 comments · 10 people in the discussion
- Idea→
- Discussing→
- Gaining support→
- Proposal→
- Voting→
- Approved→
- Building→
- In experiment→
- Shipped→
- Measured
Problem
Every reply pings with the same weight as a vote opening. Members mute everything, then miss the decision they cared about.
Why it matters
A muted hive is a hive that doesn't govern. Noise is how we lose the room.
Potential solutions
Separate decision alerts from conversation. Let people mute threads without muting votes.
Proposal #14
Notifications that respect a decision
- Problem
- Every reply pings with the same weight as a vote opening. Members mute everything, then miss the decision they cared about.
- Evidence
- Members who turned notifications off still held influence. They simply never heard the vote start.
- Proposed change
- Two channels: conversation, and decisions. Decisions stay on unless you explicitly leave an idea.
- Expected impact
- Votes reach the people who already spent influence on the problem.
- Alternatives
- A daily digest only. Too slow when a vote is closing today.
- Risks
- We can still over-message the decision channel. Cap it to open, closing soon, and result.
- Open questions
- Should the author of an idea be unable to mute their own decision?
- Complexity
- medium
- Success metrics
- Vote participation among supporters rises without a rise in mute-all.
The draft is open for discussion before a vote begins.
A product specification exists for what comes after the decision. It is a brief, not code.
Hive Intelligence · community synthesis
Synthesis
Drawn from the discussion. Not a decision.
Every reply pings with the same weight as a vote opening. Members mute everything, then miss the decision they cared about.
Evidence
- I muted after a thread hit forty replies. I found out we shipped something I had supported from a friend, not from Hive.
- The part I would spend influence on is specific: people muted all alerts and then missed votes they had supported.
- I don't want another feature. I want fewer people stuck with people muted all alerts and then missed votes they had supported.
Community sentiment
- Demand is specific. Supporters keep returning to the same broken moment, not a vague wish list.
- The objection is about scope. Concerns are less “never do this” and more “don’t do it in a way that drowns the problem.”
- People brought proof. Evidence comments describe real sessions, not hypothetical users.
Arguments for
- Decisions are the product. Replies are the workshop. They should not wear the same bell.
- Before we build “Notifications that respect a decision”, write the success metric in the proposal itself.
- A smaller version of “Notifications that respect a decision” could tell us if we even framed the problem correctly.
Arguments against
- Don't trap people in alerts they can't leave. Leaving an idea should be easy.
Alternatives
- No alternative has been spelled out. The author’s suggestion is the only concrete path on the table.
Open questions
- What about experiments going live? That feels like a decision, not a reply.
Treat “Notifications that respect a decision” as a problem statement: Every reply pings with the same weight as a vote opening. The leading suggestion is: Separate decision alerts from conversation. Why it matters here: A muted hive is a hive that doesn't govern.
Community discussion
I muted after a thread hit forty replies. I found out we shipped something I had supported from a friend, not from Hive.
Decisions are the product. Replies are the workshop. They should not wear the same bell.
Don't trap people in alerts they can't leave. Leaving an idea should be easy.
What about experiments going live? That feels like a decision, not a reply.
Before we build “Notifications that respect a decision”, write the success metric in the proposal itself.
The part I would spend influence on is specific: people muted all alerts and then missed votes they had supported.
A smaller version of “Notifications that respect a decision” could tell us if we even framed the problem correctly.
I don't want another feature. I want fewer people stuck with people muted all alerts and then missed votes they had supported.
Whatever we do with “Notifications that respect a decision”, the decision has to stay attached to this thread.
I keep running into this around people muted all alerts and then missed votes they had supported. “Notifications that respect a decision” is the name I would have used.
Join the hive to add to this thread.